Raise More Debt Before You Raise More Venture Capital

Jan 13, 2012 by

Did you have to re-read that headline a few times? I admit, it might seem a bit confusing coming from a venture capitalist.

But here’s the truth: there are plenty of expansion stage financing alternatives to VC money. In fact, there are myriad sources of capital that — depending on time, how it’s used, and the company’s needs — are better options than venture capital.

As most startup and expansion stage company founders know, debt needs to be a big part of your overall financing strategy.

But not just any debt. The key is to study the various forms of financing available to you and understand when, how, or if you should use each one.

In this post (as the headline indicated) I want to discuss Venture Debt, a concept that’s excellently explained and broken down in this document from Leader Ventures, a California-based Venture Debt firm (for the record, I don’t know Leader Ventures and can’t qualify them as a company).

Let’s start with a quick definition of Venture Debt.

To summarize Leader Ventures’ document, it’s a form of financing that, when utilized properly, can reduce dilution, extend a business’s runway, or accelerate its growth. All with limited cost to the company itself.

In short, it offers a balance between flexibility and dilution for venture equity-backed companies that lack the assets or cash flow for traditional debt financing. Venture Debt is often structured as a term loan that amortizes over time and is complementary to equity financing.

Here are a few other Venture Debt basics:

  • The typical term rate for financing is three years.
  • It’s mostly available to late stage startups with significant assets or cash flow, or expansion stage businesses that have already secured one round of venture capital.

It’s important to note that Venture Debt is different from another common form of debt financing — Convertible Debt — because it can be used like equity, includes warrants, and generally is paid back by monthly payments on principal and interest over the life of the loan. On the downside, interest rates for Venture Debt tend to be higher than Convertible Debt. (10% ore more, compared to 3-5%)

When does Venture Debt make sense?

Again, it largely depends on your company. But as Leader Ventures points out, it’s generally a viable option in these scenarios:

  • When a company wants incremental capital to accelerate growth without taking equity.
  • In conjunction with, or following, an equity round to provide additional capital without increasing dilution.
  • To add runway and enable the company to reach additional milestones, allowing it to raise its next equity round at a higher valuation.

On the flip side, it’s a very bad idea to take on Venture Debt when you’re cash balance is low and the business is in a weak financial position. The terms will likely be unfavorable and debt payments may amount to more than a quarter of operating expenses.

As Leader Ventures also mentions, if your company has stable revenue streams and accounts receivable then you might be better off looking into A/R financing — which is generally cheaper and less burdensome.

Is Venture Debt really a good idea?

It depends on who you ask. One opinion comes from Fred Wilson, who tried to answer that question on his blog, A VC, in July.

Venture Debt, Wilson writes, is a perfectly acceptable source of financing if it’s a bridge to a sale or an IPO, or if it’s used to fund an acquisition or some other value-enhancing transaction. Quite simply, Wilson writes, Venture Debt is only a good idea if the company — rather than the investors backing it — possess the creditworthiness for the loan and can absolutely pay it back.

In my opinion, Convertible and Venture Debts are two additional tools in the overall toolbox of funding options. They should only be used once your company has reached operational stability. That means your distribution model needs to be pretty baked. It means that you have budgeting and forecasting processes that are accurate and reliably predict the future performance of the company. It means that you have to have an experienced CFO who knows how to evaluate debt proposals, knows how to pick the right option, and knows how to manage debt on the balance sheet.  It means that you have the full support of your investors to fund you if your cash balance drops. It means that you should see a clear path to another funding event,whether the next VC round or an IPO (an exit is never predictable, so don’t count on it).

Check out the full document from Leader Ventures, which includes definitions of specific Venture Debt terms, some of examples of when it’s best used, and an opinion on its purpose from another respected VC.

Have you had any experience using Venture Debt as a source of financing in the past? What was your experience? And why — if at all — was it helpful in accelerating your company’s growth? Go ahead and comment…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6IF6XDOE6MQFPB7KHAV6N7KYNY David

    Beware of how an acquirer might treat debt! One company I did, I used venture debt to finance capital expansion (network and equipment). When I sold the company, the acquirer insisted on having the debt paid off as part of the acquisition proceeds. First off, the pay-off of financing midway is not great, much of the long term interest was due anyway and the warrants we then due. So it was expensive to pay this off. But, this paid off a ton of equipment, which made the asset side of my balance sheet that much better. But did we experience that upside? No, of course not. So it sort of bit us three times – used up acquisition proceeds, at a high cost, and on equipment they ended up taking! Ouch! Beware of this in your acquisition term sheet!

    • http://bit.ly/1Gu8Ha Firas Raouf

      Great point David… This issue gets worst when the acquisition price is not high enough to make the payback less relevant. Which goes back to the overall point of needing to really understand how various funding options fit with the overall aspirations and prospects of the company. In a mediocre exit, any form of past funding will look bad. In a huge win exit, all types of funding will look brilliant.

  • http://twitter.com/toloughlin Tim O’Loughlin

    Venture debt is a useful tool when used properly as you point out. There are lots of reputable sources – some more active in today’s market than others. Even the most expensive venture debt deal, provides the lender a 1.3X return on their invested capital plus warrants (maybe 2X all-in). The cautionary point that you raise is a real one – watch the impact on the burn rate. Our analysis shows default risk rises when the debt service exceeds 27% of the total burn rate. If a company initially borrows moderately and later downsizes expenses, that threshold can be reached despite the best of intentions. At that point, you’ll be glad you did reference checks with the lender’s restructured deals.

    • http://bit.ly/1Gu8Ha Firas Raouf

      Key point to highlight Tim… Hence, make sure to have a capable CFO. When managing and disposing of bombs, make sure you have a highly capable bomb disposal guy leading the way!

  • http://www.menco-finco.com/ edward blake mendez

    i agree with fred’s point that this tactical maneuvering requires astute, shrewd, and rapaciously attentive financial advisors.  without such counsel, you could enter into a zero sum game, which may not end well. 

    why would an enterprise need to have predictable, stable cash flows to raise convertible securities?  how you would model a convertible security with flexible cash flow repayments?

    thank you firas for a great post!

    blake mendez

    • http://bit.ly/1Gu8Ha Firas Raouf

      Available, predictable and steady cash flows… All descriptors imperative if you want to use debt/venture debt. To have this kind of cash flow means that the company has already dialed in a distribution model that is scalable and predictable in its outcomes (add more sales reps, get the forecasted profit and cash); that the company has a forward 12 month budget that will be adhered to with predictable results; and that the company has the option to tapping into other sources of financing should the unpredictable happen.

      Again, not to beat a dead horse… its all about being financially and operationally astute.

      Thanks for the comment Blake!

Meet Firas

Scott Maxwell

Firas Raouf is a mentor to our Portfolio, an engaged board member and plays an active role in investments.

More Articles Visit OpenView Partners Visit OpenView Labs

Sign-up Today!

Preview the OpenView Partners Viewing Value Newsletter

Videos

Videos from OpenView for expansion stage high-growth software, internet, and technology-enabled companies
  • How To Do Website Content Segmentation

    How To Do Website Content Segmentation

    Watch
  • Investor Relations: What to Do Prior to Your S-1 Filing

    Investor Relations: What to Do Prior to Your S-1 Filing

    Watch
  • APIs: Buy vs. Build with Oren Michels of Mashery

    APIs: Buy vs. Build with Oren Michels of Mashery

    Watch
  • APIs: What Are APIs (and Why Do You Need Them)?

    APIs: What Are APIs (and Why Do You Need Them)?

    Watch